Friday, October 23, 2020

Craswall, Herefordshire




The edge of the world 

On the far western edge of Herefordshire, up in the hills that dominate the border between England and Wales, lie the ruins of Craswall Priory, one of the most remote of English monasteries and the highest above sea level. Not easy to find, the ruins are on private land (which the owners open to the public) and in the Middle of Ages the place would have felt even more remote than it does today. The occupants were members of the Order of Grandmont, also known in France as the Bonshommes. They were highly austere (they were silent, ate very simple food, wore coarse habits, based their rule closely on the Gospels) and described themselves as hermits – not in the sense that they lived alone, but because seclusion from ‘the world’ was very important to them. This lonely place must have suited them.  

The ruins today are fragmentary but fascinating and atmospheric. The rounded walls of the church’s apsidal east end are visible, as are some of the walls of the chapter house and bits of foundation and wall of other monastic buildings. Everything is on a small scale – Grandmontine communities were limited in size. Most of the extant walling looks fragile, with gaps rather than mortar between many of the stones. Grass and other flora is establishing itself in the masonry. Yet there are signs of former splendour. ‘Look! Architecture!’ I cried, as I caught sight of the remains of the chapter house, shown in my photograph. The moulded base of a circular pier (one of two that would have held up a vaulted ceiling) and quite an ornate set of mouldings at the bottom of the chapter house’s doorway were what caught my attention. They look 13th century, which ties in with the priory’s foundation in around 1225. 

As one of only three Grandmontine priories in England, Craswall’s ruling or mother church was in France, where the order was founded. As such it was known as an ‘alien priory’ and English kings, suspicious of the influence of (and even spies from) enemy countries, made several efforts to remove or ‘suppress’ religious houses of this kind. Most alien priories had gone by 1414, but Craswall managed to survive until 1462. The buildings must, then, have been gradually deteriorating for well over 500 years. What is left is fragile indeed, and looks as if it needs some serious conservation work. One hopes that this will be possible – without totally losing the feeling of unkempt remoteness which is one of the things that makes the place so special. 

- - - - - 

There is more on Craswall Priory here.

Long ago I did a post about conservation work at Wigmore Castle, which wonderfully maintains the balance between building and environmental conservation. 

4 comments:

  1. No doubt some of the present remoteness is due to the disappearance of the monastery - compare Llanthony Priory over the mountain in the neighbouring valley. The small farms, whoever then owned them, would need to take up livestocking, on a less commercial scale, perhaps: although, as with the valleys of rural Mid Wales that are next door, the number of people living at them would have been much higher in the 18th-19th century than now. See the numerous graves and monuments at the local parish churches either side of the border. Even living very simply, those monks would need to organise some sophisticated agriculture to put food on the table: as Hilaire Belloc pointed out in his book on the Thames Valley, the monastic houses didn't have to provide for descendants and dowries, so often had the readies to invest in infrastructure such a bridges (regarded as an act of piety), etc. to assist efficient transmission to markets. Even little Craswall might have been fairly bustling at times. The Bonhommes at Edington, Wiltshire, didn't seem short of a penny, judging by the scale of building.

    ReplyDelete
  2. A church’s apsidal east end, the chapter house and the wall of other monastic buildings are well worth examining, nod. But the ruins in the photo are so fragmentary that the atmospheric quality is missing.

    I think that if the authorities had to suppress religious houses over the centuries, they should have left enough architecture to keep future tourists and historians happy.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Joseph: Thank you. I agree that the local impact of medieval monasteries in the ways you mention is often overlooked. They were less 'apart' from local communities than many people think. Yes, even Craswall, though it was indeed small.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hels: It's hard to convey in a photograph, but there is a sense in which the fragmentary nature of the building actually adds to the atmosphere. It's a shame the despoilers didn't think of us tourists (yes, I did laugh out loud), but it's worth remembering the architectural compensations, e.g. all the other buildings put up using recycled monastic materials. There are several houses in my town and at least one pub with fabric that includes lumps of carved stone that – beyond all reasonable doubt – came from the demolition remains of the local abbey, which has disappeared almost completely.

    ReplyDelete